Hello Framework Community,
I have been mulling this post over for a while and well, after reading a bunch of threads around the Framework 12 I thought it would make sense to open a discussion thread specifically with a claim that keeps being brought up in the discussion around the FW12: It’s a budget device.
But it is not, and this claim results in a lot of the issues found with the device just being hand waved as “Well it’s a budget device for students, what do you expect.” And I feel this is an unfair and unhelpful assessment of the situation.
First let’s look at how the device is postured and advertised on Frameworks Marketplace.
It does not at any point on its page describe itself as a budget option. Its main three highlights it leans into is its 360 hinged display with touchscreen, its performance for its size, and that it’s “ultra” durable.
So based on this we are supposed to take this as a full fledged product and a unique one at that from Framework. You would expect this unique device that advertises these features to do them well. But let’s go over them one at a time and look at how these points hold up.
-
Super Flexible Computer:
I feel this does exactly as advertised. It’s a 2 in 1 with no real focus on how it should be used. However, because of this people have noted while the stylus support is well executed and the form factor works well, it’s so inaccurate that using it for meaningful color work is difficult. -
Unusually Capable:
While I do not find this machine to be a slouch and very few users are complaining about its performance, it’s hard to ignore the large outcry about the lack luster battery life and lack of common comfort of life features. This is particularly rough with the launch of the Mac Book Neo. -
Ultra durable:
While it claims its “Shock-absorbing chassis meets MIL-STD-810 durability standards,” that standard is very broad and sweeping which covers things like immersion and pyroshock ( I do think the testing and results for this needs to be more transparent). But none of that maters when the device itself is known for an unresolved issue with the chassis randomly cracking at screw/ tension points.
All of this for a base price of $799. Which honestly could be fine. If this device was similar to the rest of the Framework line-up and had a plethora of upgrade options to customize the device to your needs it would be perfect. But currently the options you can choose between are 5 different chassis colors and 2 CPUs.
I think what would help correct the issues with this device and really solidify it as a full fledged product would be the development of actual upgrades for the FW12; many people have pointed out a color accurate screen for Art/ Film/ Photography, a backlit keyboard/ upgraded track-pad, and an improved chassis i.e. aluminum. All this would really help the device on the whole.
And I do recognize that Framework is small. Development of products takes time and money.
But it does not change that they are a company selling a product that does not live up to its basic description.
For full transparency I bought my Framework 12 second hand for dirt cheap. I customized it from Sage to Bubblegum, and love it, it works well for how I use it as an internet browser machine.
