Please also available for Framework Laptop 12.
Seams to some work done on the matter. Worth to keep an eye on.
Whoops, I just saw that page myself and made a dedicated post! I agree, Iād like to see some movement in this matter.
And in light of the new California law (and similar one coming up in Colorado), this type of work is much higher priority.
@Alex_I, which?
Legally mandated OS-level age verification: Bill Text - AB-1043 Age verification signals: software applications and online services.
@Alex_Shpilkin, why might that affect bootloader code?
It wouldnāt; at the moment, even OS code it only affects marginally. But now that this ratchet has started turning, Iām not optimistic itāll stop here, given the fertile ground the two-decade-long āSecure Bootā efforts have created and the general lack of care for freedom of computing (or speech more generally) among the electorate in every relevant country.
@Alex_Shpilkin, what, exactly, concerns you, however? I ask because all that I see cited is a writ, enforcing region-specific KYC, at the level of the OS.
Certainly, any suit, which requires determination of what constitutes an OS, could force court to institute a test, to determine whether the complexity of bare-metal code allows it to be considered to be an OS, or inapplicable, lower-level code.
However, despite most EFI implementations being OSes by most empirical metrics, the corporate pressure, and sensibilities of any technically-competent counsel, err in the favour of a sensible determination of what is and isnāt one.
Please keep your off-topic discussion about what is an operating system and how open-source firmware for laptops is unrelated to that question in private messages. There are more than 150 people subscribed to this thread.