(I’ve not yet my framework laptop, my order is in batch 7 with ryzen config)
In order to save the battery life by reducing charge cycle, is it possible and desirable to run the laptop without the battery if I if use it only as a desktop setup ?
This is a general recommendation made across the internet, but the actual science behind it is inconclusive. I have never used a charge limit on any of my machines and have faced minimal defredation over time. By minimal I mean less than 10% loss of capacity over a 4 year span. I am perfectly willing to live with that. My framework at approximately 10 months of use has lost 0.2wh of capacity over that time…completely worth it when compared to the inconvenience of intentionally crippling my battery life for a questionable end result.
The counterargument is that charge cycles are the only true way to predict the lifespan of the battery, and my personal experience has lined up with that very well. I have seen the argument go both ways, and over the years read more than I really should have on the matter, in the end I decided to ride it out and see if there really was a difference…and no discenable difference. YMMV.
Edit: What we are missing is raw capacity versus rated capacity. Most manufacturers have a built in buffer, and this is what provides a happy medium where you don’t have to micro-manage your battery for an extra three months of life over a five year span.