The way modern chips work an average 35W load will be made up of bigger spikes and wait periods between. The ec tells the soc it can pull 176W for short periods of time so it’ll take those opportunities when it sees them, doubt it ever actually manages to get that high and part of the spike will be covered by capacitors but the rest hits the battery.
Probably needs some experimentation but I didn’t see any obvious downsides to just going with 89W, if you want a little bit of dipping I’d probably do like 1.2-1.4x charger (judging by how little 89W caused a 65W charger to dip into battery, granted that was also with the modification to use all of the charger not just 90%) but I’d actually have to find a workload that benefits from high P3t first.
Going too low with p3t reduces max clocks and achievable sustained power but above the 89W (battery only) value I have not seen measurable impact on anything I looked at.
I actually didn’t care enough to keep running my modified ec but this seems pretty fixable if they wanted to. Imo the reasonable thing would be to do the 176W thing on the max performance power profile and just 90% charger (with a min of 89 or something) for balanced and powersave (could probably go even lower there and accept some reduced peak performance).