Does it really have to be a separate physical drive? Partition on a bigger drive won’t work?
A 2 or 4tb m.2 drive is likely going to be cheaper than os drive + 2 1tb expansion cards and will perform better (both on performance and power efficiency).
You can also just plug in an external nvme drive directly to the usb port. Some of the external cases have really good thermal solutions so that may give you enough performance
I can shed some light on that. After the thread was closed I contacted support, and after going through several steps (including applying a thermal pad) they determined the card was defective and told me to buy a new one.
more than half of the advice you received here is more expensive than a 2-bay nas + 2x8TB drives. if you then install tailscale you can connect to it from everywhere and you’d be only bound to the limits of your connection. plus of course you get redundancy and a lot of other usefull stuff.
fyi: the reason why i moved to this solution is that i had a 2TB usb hard drive which broke and i lost all the data.
one of the posts above shows 350 usd for a 4TB drive. a 2-bay nas + 2x 4TB drives is more or less that amount of money. doubling the capacity it starts being worth it.
Only if you actually need the double capacity, you pay for with them being orders of magnitude slower and less portable. It’s all tradeofs.
If partition on a 2tb drive works, that is a no brainier and by far the best solution available imo.
If there are actually 2tb dedicated to the secondary required I’d much rather go with the shittiest dramless 4tb drive I can find (there are sub 200$ ones) than move back to HDDs.
If you actually have any other use for the nas, getting a nas in general would be the way to go if you can live with only having acces to your 2tb of files when you have internet and only at your upload speed.
Buying 4tb hdds these days really isn’t worth it, especially since that size segment is still littered with unmarked smr drives.
But anyway the actual best solution highly depends on use case and that really was not explained so all we can do is provide options.
the problem with these usb drives is that they do not specify the actual read/write speed of the flash memory as most of them aren’t SSDs, a “USB3.1” USB drive may only have 20MB/s write speed. Better to use portable SSD instead
@bob_bowser I second your request. We have several frame.work laptops, and a major appeal is to be able to mount that spare expansion card as a data folder, and 1 TB is too small. Makes it possible for us as an organization to treat each laptop as a stock laptop with standard software, with office 365 login, and being able to plug their own drive into the machine.
This strategy has been working wonders for us. We can’t use only OneDrive to jump from one workstation laptop to the next because we use these drives for development, some of these drives have LLM models and these are large.