[RESPONDED] Battery charge control thresholds in sysfs

Does charge_full/charge_full_design represent true battery wear? I’ve been using an 11th-gen laptop for 5 months and have battery charge capped at 80%. 10% wear seems too high.

[fw ~]$ cd /sys/class/power_supply/BAT1
[fw BAT1]$ cat charge_full charge_full_design charge_now
3215000
3572000
2592000

Also cycle_count reports zero. But I guess that’s because I haven’t been using any battery manager so the kernel doesn’t know.

Hi @DHowett.

Have you got any further with your efforts to expose the battery charge limit setting to OS control?

3 Likes

Been wondering about it as well. My old-ish huawei laptop exposed those entries just fine, but the AMD framework does not - a pity. I actually used to change those depending on my use case, rebooting to BIOS is rather inconvenient, not to mention only the max charge can be changed.

You can change these with the ectool from userspace from memory (which requires david’s currently out of tree patch to support the amdfw)

Thanks for the heads up, but that’s still a workaround for me. I do use the console, but I’d like to make use of Plasma’s powerdevil / activity profiles, which means GUI. Sadly, that only works if charge_control_start_threshold and charge_control_end_threshold are exposed…

1 Like

Hello @Loell_Framework , any chance that this feature request can be taken into consideration by the DEV team?
I have the same request and several other forum users as well. Only problem is that these requests are a bit scattered around in the forum.

Given its open nature, I would totally expect FW to expose this bit via sysfs eventually.

As another user mentioned, keeping a value of 80% is great for extending battery lifespan, but being able to ramp up to 100% before a long flight/trip would be a great usability improvement, without the need to fiddle with the BIOS.

@DHowett tagging you as you kindly started working on this as well :slight_smile:

Thanks!

EDIT: other thread here

2 Likes

If you’re willing to run some rando’s third-party kernel module, you can test it out!

It also exposes things like fan speed and keyboard backlight to userland via sysfs.

5 Likes

Dhowett’s solution or bios is where were at for now.

1 Like

Thanks for the link

From the README however my understanding is that I’d need to compile my own kernel, not just the module, is that still the case?

I’m not familiar with that process at all, and of course when compared to compiling just a module, I think that it would be a different league of DIY :sweat_smile:

Hence my interest for this being upstreamed eventually. Are your upstream efforts still ongoing, and if so, is there an issue/URL I can monitor for progress?

Thanks a lot :slight_smile:

4 Likes

Thank you for this!

I’ve just built and installed the module on my 12th Gen running Fedora 39 without any problems. It was as simple as:

$ git clone https://github.com/DHowett/framework-laptop-kmod.git
$ cd framework-laptop-kmod/
$ make
$ sudo make modules_install
$ sudo modprobe framework_laptop
$ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT1/charge_control_end_threshold
80
# echo 100 > /sys/class/power_supply/BAT1/charge_control_end_threshold 
# cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT1/charge_control_end_threshold 
100

After this, I could see it start charging up past 80%.

3 Likes

Love it!

Works like a charm on Gentoo.

Using linux-next kernel, which is now 6.9-rc6, no patch is needed.
lm-sensors reports the fan speed.

2 Likes

I’m on Ubuntu 22.04 with 5.15.0-97-generic and I get these errors:

korvin@sigma:~/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod$ make
make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build M=$PWD modules
make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-5.15.0-97-generic'
  CC [M]  /home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.o
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c: In function ‘ec_get_fan_speed’:
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c:268:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
  268 |         struct cros_ec_device *ec = dev_get_drvdata(ec_device);
      |         ^~~~~~
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c: In function ‘ec_set_target_rpm’:
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c:300:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
  300 |         struct cros_ec_device *ec = dev_get_drvdata(ec_device);
      |         ^~~~~~
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c:307:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cros_ec_cmd’; did you mean ‘cros_ec_cmd_xfer’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  307 |         ret = cros_ec_cmd(ec, 1, EC_CMD_PWM_SET_FAN_TARGET_RPM, &params,
      |               ^~~~~~~~~~~
      |               cros_ec_cmd_xfer
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c: In function ‘ec_get_target_rpm’:
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c:321:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
  321 |         struct cros_ec_device *ec = dev_get_drvdata(ec_device);
      |         ^~~~~~
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c: In function ‘fw_fan_target_show’:
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c:366:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
  366 |         u32 val;
      |         ^~~
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c: In function ‘ec_set_auto_fan_ctrl’:
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c:412:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
  412 |         struct cros_ec_device *ec = dev_get_drvdata(ec_device);
      |         ^~~~~~
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c: In function ‘ec_set_fan_duty’:
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c:455:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
  455 |         struct cros_ec_device *ec = dev_get_drvdata(ec_device);
      |         ^~~~~~
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c: In function ‘ec_count_fans’:
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c:505:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
  505 |         struct cros_ec_device *ec = dev_get_drvdata(ec_device);
      |         ^~~~~~
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c:513:9: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode
  513 |         for (size_t i = 0; i < EC_FAN_SPEED_ENTRIES; i++) {
      |         ^~~
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c:513:9: note: use option ‘-std=c99’, ‘-std=gnu99’, ‘-std=c11’ or ‘-std=gnu11’ to compile your code
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c: In function ‘framework_probe’:
/home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.c:690:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
  690 |         struct cros_ec_device *ec = dev_get_drvdata(ec_device);
      |         ^~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:297: /home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod/framework_laptop.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1911: /home/korvin/work/framework/framework-laptop-kmod] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-5.15.0-97-generic'
make: *** [Makefile:12: modules] Error 2

gcc (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0

The module has not been tested on a kernel that old. It could probably work with some modifications.

2 Likes

Same here. I am happy compiling and installing a kernel module. A little less compiling a full kernel, especially since that means having to redo it on every (security or other) fedora supplied kernel update.

On Arch Linux, I installed linux-mainline-6.11rc4-1 from the chaotic-aur repo. I see that the keyboard backlight control and fan/temp sensors are working now, but /sys/class/power_supply/BAT1/charge_control_end_threshold is still missing, and I don’t see the option to control it in KDE. According to the pull request, this should be provided by the cros_charge_control driver, and I do see that the driver is present and loaded

filename:       /lib/modules/6.11.0-rc4-1-mainline/kernel/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.ko.zst
license:        GPL
author:         Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
description:    ChromeOS EC charge control
srcversion:     92B77CD0EA61B7EE89557CE
alias:          platform:cros-charge-control
depends:        
retpoline:      Y
intree:         Y
name:           cros_charge_control
vermagic:       6.11.0-rc4-1-mainline SMP preempt mod_unload 
sig_id:         PKCS#7
signer:         Build time autogenerated kernel key
sig_key:        32:D4:0F:FB:42:23:18:F3:60:32:42:67:82:C8:52:B0:40:99:F6:17
sig_hashalgo:   sha512
signature:      30:66:02:31:00:97:7D:A2:59:7B:20:22:BF:F4:C0:38:81:0E:3C:0C:
                00:D6:82:8C:69:9B:5E:F3:4C:FA:E9:7B:A8:A1:DA:B6:62:1F:AF:88:
                90:53:3E:CA:95:1C:8D:FE:D0:90:1D:B1:A8:02:31:00:94:1A:B6:41:
                6D:FE:1A:1E:F7:6C:6C:1D:B6:12:E0:0F:08:C3:96:ED:BD:0C:95:1C:
                11:6F:FB:EF:6D:5D:DD:DC:FC:C5:D8:C3:68:9B:09:C2:1E:3C:10:D2:
                9D:0A:12:24
parm:           probe_with_fwk_charge_control:Probe the driver in the presence of the custom Framework EC charge control (bool)

Is this just something that will work once the final 6.11 release is out?

You need to set the module parameter probe_with_fwk_charge_control and make sure not to use any other charge control tools. (UEFI setup, ectool, framework-laptop-kmod)

2 Likes

It is coming up for two years since @DHowett wrote (this thread, above) that ‘I’m planning on seeking upstream approval for this patch soon.’ When can we expect the kernel (or some more of less official, and easily available, module) to have the functionality at issue, please?

As soon as you have a support contract with whom you expect it from.

1 Like

Thank you for the reply. I am afraid that ‘contract with whom you expect it from’ makes little sense. Do you mean that I am expecting a paid level of service for a product for which I have not paid? If so: yet, I have paid. For, I bought a Framework laptop and that laptop is supposed to work with Linux.

You quoted @DHowett before.
He is not involved with Framework.
Neither is the person doing the mainline work for these drivers (me).
It’s a community forum, your messages are read by the community.
You could also have read this very thread which does contain the answers you are “expecting”.

4 Likes