It looks like you have similar interests to mine.
Your list of candidates is almost exactly what mine was.
In the end, I ordered a Framework, and here’s why:
I dropped the Purism early for the company’s reputation.
I would be interested in Tuxedo, except that the website is offensively bad,
they appear to only service Europe, and I can’t read any of the documentation.
MNT Reform seems to me as more of an experiment or a toy
than a practical work machine, and at a very high price.
That’s not derogatory – I own multiple Pine64 products.
The System76 Lemur is attractive.
It has a bigger battery and lower weight than the Framework, plus open firmware.
I already own a 5-year-old Galago, and was satisfied with it.
However, once I specced an apples-to-apples comparison,
the System76 ended up at a higher price despite its weaker processor.
I also looked at the Juno Nyx, but I don’t remember why I ruled it out…
maybe the lack of ANSI keyboard, or the 36W battery?
Basically it came down to Framework beating the competition on price.
The final decider for me was the release of blank and clear keyboard layouts –
which are a big UX improvement for everybody who doesn’t use QWERTY.
Contrary to many of the other opinions you’re likely to get here,
swappable ports and upgrad- and repairability were only sugar for me.
You’ll clearly get responses that are highly biased towards Framework here. Based on that, I’ll try to take a different approach.
System76, Tuxedo, and Starlabs have by far better Linux support than Framework. Their main selling point is great Linux support. System76 and Tuxedo even have their own distros, and all of them officially support multiple distros, not just Fedora and Ubuntu.
MNT is probably Linux only, but it’s awesome. For example, it allows you to replace each cell of the battery. As someone previously mentioned, it’s not quite ready to be a daily driver, though. Additionally, it features a mechanical keyboard and trackball, and the pocket version has an orthogonal keyboard.
Framework running Linux was a second thought. I’m glad that they now officially support Linux, and I think they are doing a great job in this regard.
One more minus for FW is that you have to wait to get the newest model AND they’re not available in all countries. So I think that sourcing parts will not be too easy.
HDMI or DisplayPort are fine, as most of the time on of these is readily available (maybe HDMI is more time available).
(this was mainly a disadvantage of having a miniDP on my current Laptop, which drives me insane, every time I want to connect to something and I did not bring my adapter today)
Surprised not to see more love for StarLabs here, which has not been using Clevo for builds since 2018. They have a pretty good selection of replacement parts available for purchase, disassembly guides for their laptops, and a warranty that permits repairs / replacing parts. And their 16" has a hidpi (4K) option in addition to their 165 hz gaming option (the lack of 4K is stopping me from potentially upgrading to a 16" Framework). Personally I think the machines are prettier as well. And coreboot to boot!
I love my first-gen 13" Framework and am really excited about the expansion bay possibilities for the 16", but StarLabs is clearly a great competitor in my mind.
For me it came down to a couple of factors 1) Key travel I was unable to verify it for the Starbook but I was able to verify it for the Framework 13. Coming from a T480s I wanted a good keyboard and the travel on the Framework pretty much matches that of a T480s, and based on using it for nine months now it was a good pick. Very similar feel. 2) 1920x1080 16:9 aspect ratio…if it had been a 16:10 it might have carried me over, but 3) Framework is completely modular the Starbook is not. I have never found a laptop to be completely unrepairable or to have difficulty getting parts, what I have never seen before is a guranteed upgrade path. I can run out right now and grab a new motherboard, drop it in and keep everything else. 4) While I like a black laptop…I hate anodized finishes, the process involved is not very environmentally friendly and the longterm wear on anodized finishes just is not where it would need to be. 5) Coreboot…yeah it almost pushed me the other way…but we may still get it in the Framework.
So yeah I think StarLabs have a great product but overall it was not that hard of a decision for me. The fact that they moved away from Clevo is something that should help them in the long run.
I had a 10th gen i7 Lemur Pro from System76 until a month ago. The good: amazing battery life (usually > 20 hrs), great screen, fast, flawless software support, very light, configurable keyboard The fine: keyboard and trackback was alright, case was easy to scratch/chip, first time I needed repairs it was quick/painless The bad: speakers were just terrible The ugly: second time I needed service for the same failure took 6 WEEKS, returned with missing screws and without the power adapter, they told me I was mistaken The sad: it’s completely dead now, and my AMD Framework hasn’t announced when it ships yet.
I think I got a lemon and their support is not great, but I don’t think that’s most people’s experience. I still bought their expensive Launch keyboard even after the second time the Lemur failed. I don’t think I’ll buy another Clevo based laptop though…
We have two Gen 11 FW13s (Batch 1 and I think Batch 3). I’ve run Pop OS! and Fedora on mine in addition to Windows (first 10 and now 11).
If you want to tinker or if swappable components/customized port loadout is very important, I think the Framework is the best choice. I wouldn’t trade my 13 for any of those, but that doesn’t mean I haven’t had issues. I had to do some tweaking in Windows to deal with power and sleep drain issues, my CMOS battery still frequently runs down (after I replaced it but still forget to connect it to AC power frequently), and I still occasionly experience a disconnect on the USB port where my 1TB storage module is connected.
That said, if you’re going to use it as your primary machine (so it doesn’t sit around for a week or two unattended at a time), your experience may be much different. I used mine as a primary computer with an eGPU for about a month (under Windows, not Linux) and I had no real problems. The biggest issues I’ve had under Linux have been with the AX210 adapter, but those have disappeared as kernel versions have marched forward.
As far as coding performance, I’m not building X Window or Chromium-sized source trees, but even the Gen 11 i5 is adequately powerful. I have 64GB of RAM, plenty of storage, and the convenience of being able to switch port layout around is a big plus for me. I also really like the 4:3 ratio for the display but that feels like a personal preference.
If you want a laptop that is cutting edge, performant, and made to last, then Framework is the only choice.
All of the other brands are clevo rebadges, with designs falling in line with mainstream laptop design. IE: not really repairable, and not meant to be upgraded.
The MNT Reform is a GREAT laptop but it is not about performance in the same way that the Framework one is. Its open source hardware approach requires many concessions. I have one. I really like it. You could use it as your daily laptop, but your workload needs to conform to this. The design on the Reform is top notch. 90s Thinkpad is pinnacle design.
Regarding the Linux support comment: Framework has not one but two really knowledgeable Linux experts working for them.
All of the cutting edge hardware (camera, fingerprint scanner, thunderbolt, keyboard, touchpad, lid sensor, etc.) are all 100% supported under Linux. I don’t really see how Framework’s Linux support is anywhere behind other Linux laptops?
When you factor in that your system is made to be repairable, upgradable, and to last as long as you want, I don’t see how any other laptop can really win, unless form factor or feature set are super critical.
And that’s what stopped me from buying a Tuxedo Laptop. I couldn’t get an ANSI keyboard.
In terms of a laptop with a dGPU, the only option left with a 16 : 10 screen was the Oryx Pro from System76, but that maxed out with an RTX 4070; not good enough for me, and the screen was 1920x1200, not high resolution enough.
Framework was literally my only option left. I even tried to install Linux on TWO different 2023 Windows laptops and neither had working speakers in Linux, so they went back.
I have 2560x1440 and I run at 1.75 scale factor which is about 1462px, so smaller than 1920. I don’t need such insanely detailed resolution. I’d like 16:10 screen instead of my 16:9 though
Also I don’t suggest picking up a laptop with nvidia card or you have to make sure that you can fully run the internal graphics with external monitor (I assume you don’t buy the laptop for gaming).
I am buying it mainly for programming, though I do game on the side (using Steam).
I did want Nvidia GPUs for DLSS, not necessarily 3, but for the feature in general, CUDA, and OptiX, (the latter two for Blender, which heavily benefits from OptiX on RTX GPUs), but the right laptop for me doesn’t 100% exist at the moment. Framework just happens to be by far the closest.
I almost bought the Bonobo 17 from System76, but a delay to the initial pre-orders and the lack of a 16 : 10 screen option killed it for me.
Not to mention this lack of options might be why Linux still is barely above 3% of desktop market share; there’s WAY too few 16 : 10 options in 2023!
I agree with all your points, but as someone considering upgrading their processor to AMD, I really can’t agree enough with this one in particular… it’s amazing.
As said previously some competitors give official support to other distributions. They also contribute financially and with code to the Linux ecosystem. Some of them also support coreboot too.
The difference is crystal clear.
Yes, but they also have experts so I don’t really see your point here.
What I mean is that if Linux is important to you AND the ability to repair or upgrade your investment then Framework’s Linux support is more than adequate.
Starlabs is interesting because it really does seem like they make their own laptops, BUT are any of them upgradable? Are they repairable in the same way as Framework?
Today I learned about NovaCustom laptops. They seem like an interesting choice too, due to their customization, personalization, Linux support, sustainability and they seem to ship worldwide.
i HAVE BEEN USING A LAPTOPWITHLINUX 16" for a while it is a Clevo based computer and the support has been very good . I ALSO JUST BOUGHT A framework 16 that I will be switching to some flavour of linux in the future . Framework seems the way to go just for the easy upgrades , I was thinking of this concept back in 2008 when I was changing CPU and GPUŚ on HP business laptops talk about a pain with upgrades locked out . Framework is the future no doubt
