To my understanding this is a relatively small effort project that has high rewards? It expands into a big market of younger children.
2 Likes
Will this Chromebook finally get TB4 certification? How about our 11th and 12th gen laptops?
With tests coming from Google, this laptop is likely going to be the most polished version of the three. (e.g. power consumption at load and idle, USB over current protection trigger, suspend / wake handlingâŚetc)
Money is a good motivator to getting things done [right]. And I guess Framework is seeing a lot of motivation from the Chromebook market.
@nrp, would the 1240p Chromebook still have the following TDPs or would that be capped to lower spec (by firmware or other mechanism)?
(Consumer laptop market have been filled with handicapped laptop models over the years for tier / pricing differentiation. e.g. a 12700H in one model does not perform the same as another 12700H model)
1 Like
As someone whoâs put in quite a bit of effort to de-Google my life, I have to admit this announcement initially made me cringe.
However, after giving it some thought I have warmed up to the news. Regardless of how I might feel about it, Chromebooks are here to stay as they are perfect for certain use cases and are likely going to continue getting better. The big win here is where a junky $200 Chromebook will probably see a year of use before hitting the landfill, this machine could potentially last five or ten years, or even more with proper maintenance and upgrades.
Not only does this directly curb senseless e-waste, but it also opens the door to more people learning to access, repair, and upgrade their devices instead of shucking them aside for something new off the shelf that is basically their same device but not broken yet.
So while this product does not interest me personally, I do think there is a real potential for good with this partnership. Well done Framework. *tips hat *
12 Likes
Well how would one help the other? If your getting help from Intel (probably not without strings) on hardware and software in the form of drivers and such how would switching to an open source alternative like coreboot require Google helping? Especially since this seems to be a new board tailored around support already existing for that particular hardware and chromebooks in general have very limited hardware support anyway. If they needed help with software then further stretching your resources supporting a, for now at least, one off product from the rest of your offerings seems counter-productive.
I too hope we at least get these two improvements out of this collab. I suspect this has more to do with trying to jump aboard the massive growth curve chromebooks saw during 2021. It may be too little too late though as sales plummeted 68% in Q4 2021 and continued declining in the first half of 2022. I respect the optimism though and hope to be proven wrong in this case.
While in theory that would be great I think the market for children asking for repair-friendly hardware over say an Apple product is even smaller than the already small market cap for $900+ chromebooks. Of the top 20 models sold on newegg (per their rankings) there is one in that price range and itâs number 20.
Google has a lot of devs working on that project. Basically all Chromebooks ship with Coreboot I think.
Not when they are learning things from the collaboration. Things that can at least be incorporated into new products if not backported to older models.
I suspect this part has less to do with pure money than it does on releasing a halo product. Most parents wonât spend $900 on a Chromebook or any laptop for that matter destined to a child (K-12). I wouldnât. When it comes time to Google âBest Chromebookâ what gets listed? Nobody cares about 2nd best. Framework doesnât have much competition in this market segment, Iâd guess this is just another way to get their name out there. I donât know what Google had to do to secure Framework, but I bet it didnât come cheap. FW has enough on their plate that I suspect convincing had to be done to make it worth doing for FW.
2 Likes
Seems like everyone has pretty well explored a lot of angles here that initially occurred to me. And so thoroughly in one day⌠Hot button topic I guess. The only thing worth duplicating, for me is: gimme coreboot plz
All and all, seems like a reasonable play. We can all see the pros and cons; the tradeoffs seems pretty worth it to me. Short of big G buying out FW entirely, I donât really feel like there is much to worry about - and, personally, donât really see that happening.
9 Likes
As someone that wants AMD for external display aspect ratio preservation reasons on Linux, could you spell out what you are seeing a bit more clearly? My initial impression was that there were headers or paragraphs beginning with A, M, and D but Iâm not seeing anything like thatâŚ
1 Like
You are welcome. I wish Frameworkâs success like many people on this forum. And I find updating the Frameworkâs Wikipedia page following Wikipediaâs rules is a good way for Frameworkâs success. I am sometimes motivated to update the Wikipedia page. And in the process of updating the Wikipedia page, I collect information sources like media articles first. 
5 Likes
Tbh I just found a capital âA, M, Dâ randomly in there XD
Iâve seen reports that Google is cancelling the Pixelbook line; there will be no future systems. Perhaps this is meant to fill the gap for people who are looking for a high end Chromebook. Itâs not an expensive addition to Frameworkâs lineup (most of the parts are common with other Framework models) and theyâll get some press, so I think itâs a win for both Framework and Google.
Donât want a Chromebook? The standard versions arenât going anywhere, and you can run Windows or Linux on those.
Premium Chromebooks arenât for everybody. They will always be niche products; most users in enterprises that adopt Chromebooks will be just fine with lower end models. But there are some people who will want them:
- C-level executives at companies that adopt Chromebooks
- Developers at those companies
- Linux users and developers who will use the Chromebook primarily to run Linux applications
5 Likes
I was under the impression that Google is designing their custom silicon to follow in the footsteps of Apple, eventually with both phones and laptops, aka Chromebooks, using those chips (Google Tensor).
Ars Technica reported a couple of weeks ago that the Pixelbook team has been disbanded: Googleâs cost-cutting kills Pixelbook division | Ars Technica
There is also this story from Chrome Unboxed: https://chromeunboxed.com/tensor-pixelbook-google-chromebook-not-happening/
1 Like
Sorry⌠How exactly are people supposed to functionally leverage android app support if thereâs no touchscreen?
ChromeOS is pretty nice to navigate with touch. Every decent, far cheaper Chromebook Iâve used has had a touchscreen. Is that really not coming?
I have some thoughts about Googleâs motivation to collaborate with Framework.
Google has grown by leveraging both public and private data. The data is the source of the companyâs growth. When Framework grows, people open their hardware with the CAD file more, thriving user-driven ecosystem, there will be more data in this area.
This means Google can extend their boundary of business to the hardware world. Google sells their own hardware products now. But in the world where there are more user-and-company-driven open hardware ecosystems, itâs another level.
Ah that sucks. Perhaps they realise they are too far away from Apple (look at how good iPads are now, even the base models). Perhaps it will be revisited again if they can dial in for their Pixel phones, just like Apple making a switch from Intel.
1 Like
Chromebook-loving people (at Google?) talking about the Framework Laptop Chromebook edition.
Pixel 7 pricing, Chromecast HD, and a Framework Chromebook - The Chrome Cast Podcast
3 Likes
Sorry, I donât quite get your argument. What kind of data are they looking for that they canât get currently?
To me, it seems thereâs an obvious motivation for collaboration. From Googleâs perspective, this (a) creates a flagship hardware product for their software product, (b) takes over the space the Pixelbook used to fill, and (c) can help get more people on their platform, funneling them into Google services, which serve the ad platform.
Not really directed at you, but I donât really see how that data collection is very different than the telemetry Microsoft collects through Windows, since they are also in the ad business. You can see all the changes in W11 designed to funnel people into Bing services.
@Jeremiah_Jones Sorry I shortened the context too much.
In my assumption or fantasy, Google wants the data of the CAD files (sources) for many hardware for Googleâs long-term benefit. For example, Google currently can not get the CAD files of a Lenovo laptop, a Samsung display, a Sony headset, a Toyota car, or IKEA furniture. Because all of the CAD files (sources) are closed currently. But if people start to use open hardware sharing the CAD files publicly a little by little in their lives, Google (and other companies) can use the data.
According to the Alphabetâs finance reports, for example, the year 2022âs second quarterâs financial report is here. On page 2, âRevenues, Traffic Acquisition Costs (TAC) and number of employeesâ section. the revenue from the Google ad is around 80% of the total revenue of Alphabet.
- Total revenue: 69,685 million USD
- Google ad revenue: 56,288 million USD
- 56288 / 69685 = 0.807 => 81%
Of course, Google gets the revenue from the hardware itself. And I think itâs a little of the total revenue. I think Googleâs services and products are frontend to make users use the backend services: Google search engine and Youtube that produce more revenues by the advertisement, and also to get user activity data for specific products and services. So, for Googleâs short-term strategy, they just want to have a frontend service or product with high user activity and retention.
In terms of the user activity data from an OS, Windows, or ChromeOS, there is no difference. But I think Google has a stronger system to monetize userâs activity, Google Adwards for Google Search Engine, and a Youtube revenue program on Youtube (I am not familiar with Youtube). I am not familiar with Microsoftâs ad system on their search engine (Bing), and how much Microsoft depends on the revenue from the advertisement.
Google (and maybe Microsoft too)'s ad business is to create meaningful data for advertisers, then connect advertisers with users. The larger size of the data is more meaningful for advertisers. Itâs not what many companies can do.
Back to the topic of why Google has benefits with productâs sources (CAD files), for example
- Search engine to search specific parts of the CAD file. Google has a search engine for some categories, websites, images, scientific papers, and books. So, itâs a version of a CAD file.
- Recommendation: Suggest generated CAD files for specific user inputs by machine learning.
- Meaningful data: For example, a person who has trait A has a specific âhardware partâ or âhardwareâ B. An advertiser wants to use the data for their advertisement.
- Imagine Googleâs offline store like Amazonâs 4-star store in the US. You go to the store. Then you say âOK. Google, I want a laptopâ. And Google knows about you more than you. Google gives you the best laptop you want now, 3d-printing a generated new CAD file for you with some metal and plastic materials.
These are just my intuitive ideas.
1 Like
Chromebooks for me are meant to be almost disposable. You pay ÂŁ250 and take it on holiday. If it gets trashed no worries. When it goes out of support after 5 years whatever, no worries.
This is way over specced. Why did Google hardly sell any of their mega top end Pixelbooks?
Lovely machines but overkill for what a Chromebook needs to be.
This is a V8 golfcart.