It was closed because it was crossposting - actually it was merged into an existing thread you posted the same information in. You’re creating a thread with the exact same information as a previous longer thread with more posters and more information.
We’re sorry the previous thread didn’t work for you and your post didn’t get any responses, but we can’t control that. However if everyone made their own thread for the same issue it would be chaos around here. How would anyone find any information at all? Which thread would be the most definitive?
Don’t take it personally - we’re not trying to minimize your issue, we’re trying to organize it so all the information about the issue is in the same thread. Since the solutions in the other thread didn’t work for you, maybe you’ve found an edge case and maybe if a solution is found it will benefit others. Maybe there is no solution - which is unfortunate but sometimes this happens. But if these issues and solutions are scattered all over, with several threads going on simultaneously presenting different solutions or discovering the same ones, or if threads die out and new ones start later, it makes it very difficult for everyone else to sort this out in order to get help themselves. Which thread is the most definitive? It ends up duplicating effort and diluting knowledge.
We can’t catch this all the time because it’s hard to know if it’s the exact same issue that’s going on in two simultaneous threads. But sometimes we do and we should make an effort at least to try to bring some order here.
I know you’re frustrated, but hopefully you can see these points.
Normally we’d merge this thread into an existing one, but we’ll keep this up as an exception. Please don’t make a habit of it though.
The first step is to measure what kind of speed you’re getting right now, so you can definitively tell if a change improves or degrades that speed. I like Speedtest.net for that kind of thing; you may have a different one that you prefer. Doesn’t matter which one you use, so long as you use the same one in all subsequent tests so the results are directly comparable.
Since you have another system (your desktop) that operates at full speed with that router, presumably also over wifi, the problem has to be with the laptop itself. The next question is, is it hardware or software?
The easiest way to figure that out is to create a “live USB” drive with a different OS on it. Once you’ve created the drive, boot your FW13 into Ubuntu with it and select the try-it-out option (instead of the install-it option) when prompted. Then run your speed test again within Ubuntu and see if it is significantly different.
If your speeds are much better under Ubuntu, then the problem is with your Windows installation, likely a driver problem. Reinstalling the Windows wifi driver would be the most likely solution in that case.
However, if your speeds are about the same under Ubuntu, then the problem has to be hardware-based. The first things I’d try would be opening up the FW13, re-seating the network card, and making sure that the antenna wires are firmly connected when you’re done.
If none of that improves your speeds, you may have to contact Framework support and give them all of that information. They may have further tests you can run, or might know of another solution.
Hey,
So I have not had a chance do to the live usb test you mentioned but I did change my router to only use wifi 5 and then run the speedtest on my desktop (cable not wifi), the framework and my phone (Honor Play).
The framework was really, really bad!!
Attached are the speeds and you can see what I mean.
I just found out it is an issue with the signal strength from my router.
I tested the speeds in my lounge room and then went to the room where the router is and ran the test right next to the router and the download speed went from 48Mbps in the lounge room to 842Mbps next to the router.