Pine64 is surprisingly shady sadly. Their products I have to say are cool, but once you look into the history of their company you can see how shady they are. They basically drop hardware and then ask the community to do the actual firmware. Also just pure lack of communication.
To be understood I do own pine64 hardware, this is just my experience as being part of the community for the last 4 years or so.
I entirely agree. Pine64 is almost run like a factory-to-consumer supplier (think Aliexpress), but slightly better. They supply hardware, and only hardware. It’s a curse and a blessing. On the one hand, the community has to support everything, but on the other hand, most all of the firmware is open source and an excellent community surrounds the project.
Having daily driven a Pinephone, I would certainly consider a Pinebook or Pinetab if my laptop wasn’t my only computer (especially given the price). But I by no means am suggesting its a solution for everyone. Perhaps I should describe them more as toys for giganerds then actually useful laptops. Cool and certainly worth a look, maybe even useful for some people, but not a real Framework competitor.
Can confirm that basically all Pine64 products I’ve ever gotten have felt half-baked and are barely functional, and even ones that function when they arrive will often fail when a new version of the OS is shipped, and often they’ll start with 6-7 distros that work, and ultimately you’ll end up with only 1 working distro after a year after release, and that distro is usually Manjaro. That said, I do still have a few Pine64 products I use, but they’re far, far inferior to my Framework products.
At this point if any of Framework’s competitors in this space have solid business ethics the best thing they could do would be to jump in this thread and disavow being interested in taking customers purely based on this nonsense. This mob will just come for them then next time around when some perceived slight happens from their court. Much better to play their cards hard the same way Framework has started too (and I hope they continue) just staying out of the weeds, making good computers, selling them on the merits of the actual platform (e.g. repairability), and broadly supporting the FOSS ecosystem.
Unfortunately, all that shows you is the very last step in the process: final assembly location. Everything more advanced than a hand-picked banana relies on China in some way or another. The final assembly label doesn’t tell you where the raw materials came from or anything about the global supply chain, tooling, or anything to get to that final assembly step.