Are Framework 16 front ports (3 & 6) kinda useless?

However you explained before,

the 4.5W is “at least” power of USB3 i.e the any USB3 port must supply a minimum of 4.5W, thus a port with 7.5W is still within spec, deliberately making laptops cut power when current is at 0.9000000000001A is doing more harm than good, a USB port shouldn’t be a “policing” devices IMO. Just my 2 cents.

Regardless, Framework should mark the power ratings alongside the data speed on the picture of ports, a 10Gbps 4.5W is still different than a 10Gpbs 7.5W port

I lsusb -t on my FL13 and I got this

$ lsusb -t
/:  Bus 001.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/5p, 480M
    |__ Port 004: Dev 002, If 0, Class=Vendor Specific Class, Driver=[none], 12M
    |__ Port 005: Dev 003, If 0, Class=Wireless, Driver=btusb, 480M
    |__ Port 005: Dev 003, If 1, Class=Wireless, Driver=btusb, 480M
    |__ Port 005: Dev 003, If 2, Class=Wireless, Driver=[none], 480M
/:  Bus 002.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/2p, 10000M
/:  Bus 003.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/1p, 480M
/:  Bus 004.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/1p, 10000M
/:  Bus 005.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/1p, 480M
/:  Bus 006.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/1p, 10000M
/:  Bus 007.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/1p, 480M
/:  Bus 008.Port 001: Dev 001, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/1p, 10000M

Where’s USB4 40Gbps, I only got 10Gbps and 480Mbps, or simply because lsusb -t is inaccurate?