Pinout of the 16's 85whr battery?

This is just my 2 cents, not a “right or wrong” argument, agree to disagree

I think it’s a bit better if the battery manufacturers label the realistic Limited Charging Voltage instead of labeling a higher voltage that is only available on the first 100-ish cycles. Most if not all laptop from more than a decade ago did the actual sustained voltage, the Limited Charging Voltage is the voltage from the beginning to 1000 cycle and beyond.

The meaning or purpose of charging to 80% increase battery life is to make the runtime available longer when max endurance is needed as you can always charge to 100% on demand. If the upper capacity is blocked by BMS for the sake of preserving the battery life doing so would be meaningless.

More than one, one 61Wh user and a 55Wh user, probably more as many users aren’t active in the forum.

Here’s an example of an LCO battery(probably made by ATL) used on portable devices

This. I have a 8 y/o phone that use ATL battery, the same battery brand used in FL, it doesn’t lower the voltage even after 1200~1600-ish cycles and it’s durable as heck. The cycle is probably 1800~2000 and the battery health is still at 72% to 75%.
For many older batteries, the aging won’t accelerate even after 1000 cycles, in fact, quite the opposite, the aging slowed down after 800-ish cycles. If newer batteries have to reduce voltage to reduce the aging acceleration, the voltage is too high to begin with.
In conclusion, older batteries’ initial charging voltage is sustained voltage is the Limited Charging Voltage labeled. Recently, battery manufacturers boost the battery voltage to give better initial runtime to gain a competitive edge. However, this is not sustainable so they have to dial back after a certain cycle, to the “original” voltage. Since the newer capacity is calibrated using the “instantaneous” voltage and this voltage is labeled as Limited Charging Voltage. For a given chemistry, using a newer BMS will yield a higher labeled capacity/energy density.

1 Like