Took that quite personally, didn’t you? Here’s a link to a bunch of folks on the Coreboot ticketing system saying pretty much the same things. Also, I never once said that anyone lied. I said that Framework claimed to work with some people, and they won’t identify any of them (fair), but that the larger community around Coreboot remains un-engaged (which is true, as far as I can tell).
The plain truth remains this: Framework made an overture, it didn’t work out, and the answer given is that board level documentation is provided only to authorized repair agencies, under NDA. Between this and the lack of any new developments on the three one-off laptops three years ago, it looks like Coreboot on Intel Frameworks is pretty dead. I was just lamenting that, not casting any aspersions or lambasting anyone. Framework isn’t obligated to support Coreboot, or anyone else.