7680×2160 @ 240 Hz

Hey folks — I’m looking for real-world confirmation from anyone running the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57” (G95NC) on the Framework Desktop.

The Desktop specs list DP 2.1 “up to 10 Gb/s” per port (so likely UHBR10). On paper UHBR10 with DSC should be able to hit the Neo G9’s full mode, but I want to verify before buying.

If you have this setup (or something close), could you share:

  1. What max mode you can actually run?

    • 7680×2160 @ 240 Hz?

    • If not, what’s the ceiling (e.g., 120/144/240 at reduced res)?

  2. AMD Adrenalin connection details (screenshot preferred):

    • Link rate shown (UHBR10 / UHBR13.5 / etc.)

    • Whether DSC is enabled/active

    • Color depth / format at max refresh

  3. Cable + port used

    • DP port on Desktop (which one)

    • DP cable brand/model (UHBR-rated?)

    • Any quirks needed to get full refresh (firmware updates, toggles, etc.)

Even if you don’t have the Neo G9, Strix Halo / Radeon 8060S owners:

Have you confirmed UHBR rate + DSC in Adrenalin on any high-bandwidth DP 2.1 display? Screenshots welcome.

Thanks a ton — trying to confirm full dual-4K@240 capability in practice.

1 Like

AMD lists some of their specifications here under “Graphics Capabilities”:

https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/ai-300-series/amd-ryzen-ai-max-plus-395.html

It’s not every resolution though, since they leave out all the widescreen and oddball resolutions that are supported, but we can see some important clues in this part: “7680x4320 @ 60Hz , 3840x2160 @ 240Hz” as that suggests that perhaps 120Hz would be possible to this monitor over a single cable.

That said, I looked up the Samsung G95NC and it supports dual inputs in their 4K side-by-side mode. So in theory perhaps you could run dual 4K 240Hz outputs from the Framework to the dual inputs of the monitor. But yeah, maybe somebody who has actually done this (if anyone here) could chime in.

1 Like