12th Gen Intel Core BIOS 3.06 Beta

Hey @Matt_Hartley thanks for the update. Do you have answers to my questions from August yet?

1 Like

Iā€™ll ping ya there. :slight_smile: - DMā€™d ya. The idea here is to keep these threads on focus - releases and beta testing. Thanks

All,
This will be the last reply on this thread until we have an update.

4 Likes

Not the support or warranty period. The standard grace period given by security researchers to vendors before a vulnerability is publicly disclosed whether itā€™s been patched or not is 90 days.

(This is a compromise between, on one hand, immediate full disclosure, which is fair but also sends everybody scrambling to patch and gets users harmed in the meantime; and, on the other hand, allowing the vendor to dictate the disclosure timeline, which historically had by many of them been taken as license to extend it indefinitely for literal years. Declaring a deadline in advance preempts accusations of extortion. The specific value is largely arbitrary, of course, but this one is reasonable and commonly accepted.)

3 Likes

Does ā€œwhen weā€™re readyā€ mean the dedicated supplier post-launch support team that Nirav described two months ago is in place and working on the update but the update isnā€™t ready, or does it mean resources to work this arenā€™t even in place yet (as alluded to by the ā€œsmall teamā€ comment)?

I feel bad ranting about this issue. I love the Framework hardware and the ethos it embodies. I still believe that sustainability is more than just a marketing ploy to the Framework team. But inaction has challenged that perception to the point where Iā€™m seriously on the verge of selling my Framework and finding a better supported and/or more open alternative.

5 Likes

I feel the same. But for me it is not just inaction, but also lack of communication and the communication style.
There was no clarification whether the contract is only negotiated or is already in-place. Since nothing happened in the last 2 months, I have the impression the wording was ambiguous by intention.

2 Likes

Iā€™m still on BIOS 3.04 - now that we are talking about testing 3.08, is there anything in between that I should have updated to?

I remember 3.06 got scrapped, but now Iā€™m wondering if I just overlooked 3.07 because I stopped visiting this thread often.

Im sorry to tell you, but noone is talking about testing 3.08.
There is no 3.07.
3.06 is still the lastest available Beta BIOS and we got no ETA for a new version

There has only been a 3.06 version made available (for 12th gen intel models), as a beta. The installation is apparently a bit unreliable, and un-reversable, may require some perseverance - view reports above. There was a vague report from a framework employee of a later version, in early summer, but the EFI/linux installer for it reportedly didnā€™t work, and Iā€™m guessing it had other issues, because it was never made available. It seems like attempts have been made, but they just canā€™t get a ā€œgood enoughā€ release together, so far.

I donā€™t own a 12th gen intel model, but I started browsing the forums and found this thread shortly before I received my AMD model that I pre-ordered in the spring. I like it, and I still love Framework, but man, this firmware release situation sucks, it truly does.

For what itā€™s worth: work on the 13" AMD model, and the 16" model, started before this 3.06 beta firmware for the 12th gen intel was released. Iā€™m guessing that it was really not economically viable, for a startup like Framework, to pause that release train in order to focus on intel 12th gen firmware.

Anyway, my sincere hope (and I still do have hope) is that Framework have learned the lesson that firmware is very difficult and expensive. Theoretically, it should be easier than hardware, but in practice, not really. Iā€™ve worked on firmware before, and Iā€™ve worked on server-side data processing for a small division of a big hardware company, that is kinda infamous for bad software (but great hardware), and Iā€™ve reviewed firmware written by teams in asia ā€¦ and I really could rant for hours. But I think the take-away is that, hardware companies know that the hardware has to be validated before production, every little trace has to have been worked on or reviewed by a hardware engineer that truly knows their s***. But software, we can just patch it up and fix it later! The team is following industry-standard best-practices! Well now you know, not so easy, you might actually have a problem harder to fix than the entire hardware design, anything is possible. It will just take a while longer to get teams spun-up, they should have started 18 months ago, but alas ā€¦

7 Likes

The ā€œweā€™re a scrappy startup without the resources to maintain firmwareā€ argument isnā€™t acceptable. They donā€™t tell customers with hardware warranty issues ā€œWeā€™re busy with the Framework 16 right now - weā€™ll get back to you in a year or two.ā€ Full lifecycle support (hardware and firmware) should be factored into the business plan from the beginning. An understandable oversight on the 11th gen? OK, correct it on the 12th gen. That obviously didnā€™t happen and thereā€™s no evidence that 13th gen/AMD are any different (anyone seen status, or even acknowledgement, on a LogoFail fix for 13th gen/AMD?).

Is it difficult/expensive? Perhaps. Itā€™s more difficult/expensive when choices are made to rely exclusively on proprietary 3rd party firmware. Getting a Framework with BootGuard disabled isnā€™t possible, so the community is completely locked out of the process. If CoreBoot was even an option on the Framework (Iā€™m not advocating for it to be default, just an option) we would have an active firmware development community that would cost Framework almost nothing.

I have been willing to cut Framework some slack because they are a small company challenging some bad industry practices. But the lack or openness on firmware support (despite the fact that they can send me weekly spam on how great the Framework 16 design is) has exhausted my patience.

7 Likes

Can things be improved? Sure. If you feel that a different vendor is more fitting for you, vote with your feet. The points are legitimate, but the incessant bitching is too much. You signed up with a startup, deal with it or move on.

Have a good day.

2 Likes

There has been an acknowledgement, yes:

2 Likes

Are the accounts on here that just say - ā€œframeworks a startup, deal with it or move onā€ -just framework employees with seperate accounts?

2 Likes

Not mine. Is yours?

1 Like

INB4 they lock this thread again.

4 Likes

Yes, you folks are rockstars. I appreciate the patience you must have with some of us. and the creativity to design, program and publish hardware, software and documentation.

gotcha, thx. Ive read before that these may in some cases be extended, unless emediate action due to other reasons OR non cooperative vendors and other reasons. 90 days it probably is

I was imagining .08 based on them working on .07 before the LogoFAIL vulnerability. I have no insider knowledge and they might release .07 with all these patches applied. sorry about the confusion

this may be still in the works, its where my hope is anyway. untill then, I hope for 3.06 or a stable 3.07.

I havenā€™t seen that anyone has a fix available, but FW have acknowledged the problem and that Insyde are working on a fix. And I would expect that fix will be for ALL manufacturers that Insyde supply, not just FW, as it is a general problem with the BIOS, not just a problem for FW.

1 Like

A fix to Insydeā€™s baseline doesnā€™t help Framework owners until someone merges it into each Framework branch and goes through the build/test cycle. Getting Insyde to fix major CVEs isnā€™t a huge challenge. Getting those fixes into a Framework firmware update seems to be a different story.

But Iā€™ve been on this soapbox too long already. If, as many have stated, I simply shouldnā€™t expect timely post-launch firmware support from a startup like Framework, then I guess my path is clear.

2 Likes

ā€œthis isnā€™t an airport; you donā€™t have to announce your departureā€ or better, what does your reply constructively add to the current conversation?

EDIT:

something snapped, instead of keeping my mouth (keyboard) shut for many many replies, I want a constructive thread and if i see an update in my mail. I finally wanted to say something, not only to David, but all those ā€œif this continues, then ill leave/shop elsewhereā€.
Id much rather see a message about the status of said beta or upcoming new version. another complaint is not fun and not very helpful. Your reply is describing as-well how I feel, and worded nicely. including the last paragraph. hopefully earlier (in a positive way), but in this thread, have a great new year and other festivities :smiley:.

9 Likes

Itā€™s funny youā€™re latching onto this particular reply, since most of the messages in this topic (likely including some comments of my own from a while back) arenā€™t particularly constructive.

I know Iā€™m probably only contributing to the problem here, but: can we just stop? Framework isnā€™t going to give us more updates until they have something substantive to say, and whining about that fact isnā€™t going to change anything, if all the prior whining about it is any indication.

I get the desire to vent about the situation (Iā€™m pretty upset about it myself), but subscribing to this topic has become about as useful as spam. When I see a notification email about it, I no longer think ā€œoh, cool, maybe thereā€™s an updateā€, but instead assume itā€™s just someone complaining about the lack of updates, which is boring, uninteresting, and doesnā€™t constructively add to the current conversationā€¦ to borrow the phrase.

So can we all please just stop posting here? Iā€™d be really happy if the next email notification I get on this topic is about a new beta release, not more complaining about the lack of oneā€¦ even if that joyous notification doesnā€™t come for another year, thatā€™d still be much nicer.

4 Likes

The fix here isnā€™t for people to stop posting their thoughts, worries, and expectations. The fix to bring constructive discussion into this thread is for framework to start supporting their sustainable products. After a year and 3 additional product launches I think we have all paid our dues in money and patience to be allowed to express our frustration.

10 Likes