Framework 13 Pro SSD Power Budget

I’m hoping for advice on power budget considerations when buying an SSD for the Framework 13 Pro, also taking heat into consideration.

The WD_Black SN8100 is a drive that I’ve been strongly considering since it’s Gen5x4, has DRAM cache, and supports TCG Opal.

It’s described by Sandisk as having the following power specs:
Average Active Power Read: 6.4W
Average Active Power Write: 7.0W
Maximum Working Temperature: 85ºC (185ºF)

Strangely, no maximum power specification is provided by WD/Sandisk, but I found this test that mentions 6.8W was the maximum they observed (strange considering that’s under the manufacturer’s spec).

Of the options on the Framework configuration page, the SN7100 draws 3.7W Max and the SN850X draws 6.3W Max. In terms of performance, the comparable drives would be with the Phison PS5031-E31T. I can’t find specifications for the PS5031-E31T drives Framework is offering, but for example techpowerup states that the Corsair MP700 Elite 2TB (Phison E31T) has a maximum power draw of 4.7W. The Kioxia Exceria Plus G4 2TB is also E31-based and tested at 5W max with 3.2-3.4W average. So it looks like a Phison E31T SSD draws around 4W.

Might anyone be able to advise me on whether the WD_Black SN8100 is a good choice (or not) for the Framework 13 Pro?

Since the SN8100 is higher power, it runs hotter. The thermal stress test in the reviews linked above place the SN8100 at 102ºC, vs 87.3ºC for the Kioxia Exceria Plus G4 (14.7ºC higher). Is this significant enough to cause problems, or cause the fan to be running often?

The SN8100 draws almost twice as much power (3.5W more) than the Kioxia Exceria Plus G4 2TB during average use, is this a reason for concern?

Good ole ay eye

NVMe SSD active power comparison (lower = better for laptops)

Drive Gen Active power Controller DRAM
Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4.0 x4* 5.0 W Samsung Piccolo No
Crucial P510 5.0 x4 ~5.5 W Phison E31T (6nm) No
Samsung 990 Pro 2TB 4.0 x4 5.7 W Samsung Pascal Yes
WD Black SN8100 5.0 x4 6.4 / 7.0 W SM2508 (6nm) Yes
WD Black SN850X 2TB 4.0 x4 ~7.0 W WD Black G2 Yes
Samsung 9100 Pro 2TB 5.0 x4 8.1 / 7.9 W Samsung Presto 5nm Yes
Samsung 9100 Pro 4TB 5.0 x4 9.0 / 8.2 W Samsung Presto 5nm Yes
Crucial T710 2TB 5.0 x4 8.25 W SM2508 (6nm) Yes
Crucial T705 2TB 5.0 x4 11.25 W Phison E26 (12nm) Yes

*990 EVO Plus is Gen4 x4 / Gen5 x2 capable

Read/Write split shown where datasheet publishes both; single number = rated max.
Sources: SanDisk, Samsung, and Crucial datasheets; Tom’s Hardware and KitGuru measurements.

Takeaways for a Gen5 x2 slot like the FW13:

  • SM2508-based drives (SN8100, T710) and Samsung’s Presto (9100 Pro) are the
    efficient Gen5 picks. They run 6-9W active vs. the older Phison E26’s 11W+.
  • Avoid Phison E26 drives (T700, T705) if you care about heat or battery.
  • The x2 link doesn’t dramatically cut power - controller and NAND dominate
    the draw, not the SerDes lanes. The datasheet x4 numbers are a safe ceiling.
  • For a low-power Gen5 option with TCG Opal + DRAM, the SN8100 is currently
    the best balance. If TCG Opal isn’t required, the P510 sips ~5.5W but is
    DRAM-less.