Expansion Cards performance over time

Does anyone have any information about the performance degradation of the 1 TB and 256GB cards over time, especially as they heat up?

2 Likes

I have both cards, so I can share some data. I ran the following tests in CrystalDiskMark and logged read/write speeds with HWiNFO64.

SEQ1M 8Q1T, 8 mins of read, 8 mins of write. Red is the 1TB card, green is the 256GB card.

SEQ1M 1Q1T, 8 mins of read, 8 mins of write. Red is the 1TB card, green is the 256GB card.

RAND4K 1Q1T, 5 mins of read, 5 mins of write. Red is the 1TB card, green is the 256GB card.

As an example, “SEQ1M 1Q1T” means 1 MB of sequential reads or writes with queue depth 1 and a single thread.

5 minutes of idle time was given between the read and write portions for each test. File size in CrystalDiskMark was always set to 1 GB.

Here are the actual logs generated by HWiNFO64: link. You’ll need this software to view the graphs.

4 Likes

It looks like the 256GB card is just fast enough for my needs.

Good info. Thanks!

1 Like

Glad to help! Forgot to mention above, those two tests are sequential.

I didn’t initially realize that my data could affect purchasing decisions, so I think I’ll add some more comparisons soon.

3 Likes

I ended up getting the 1TB just in case it slows down too much when it heats up :smiley:

Clearance is just purrfect.

It seems to be able to handle whatever format the camera throws at it, and when I’m done I just edit off the drive on the laptop (and still have nothing dangling out from the sides muhahaha).

I’ll have to do a full duration test to make sure but at 800 Mbps read and write I’m pretty sure it will hold up.

(I’m so greedy I already want another drive :smiley: ).

3 Likes